| Field | Content |
|---|---|
| Name | Host www.arenabreakoutinfinite.com, apex correlated arenabreakoutinfinite.com |
| Correlation | Registrar RDAP lists registrant organisation Proxima Beta Europe B.V.; public distribution channels cite Arena Breakout: Infinite on Steam/Epic storefronts independently of WHOIS depth. |
| Country | Netherlands flag on WHOIS-grade address stub (Registrar RDAP adr.cc=NL) with multi-region CDN footprints when resolving www. |
| Website | https://www.arenabreakoutinfinite.com/en/index.html |
| Purpose | Due diligence perimeter screen for phishing/infra legitimacy and policy alignment when linking or contracting around the marketed download funnel. |
| Data collected | Snapshot queries on 2026-05-21 (RDAP freshness stamps show same-day Registrar/Registry synchronization). |
| Open questions | Formal contracting counterparty LEI/KvK filings for Proxima Beta Europe B.V.; whether your policy treats Tencent-linked intermediaries differently from generic EU-incorporated marketers. |
Object: Public web host www.arenabreakoutinfinite.com terminating TLS for marketing HTML promoting Arena Breakout: Infinite (PC).
Identifiers sampled: Registry handle 2805473348_DOMAIN_COM-VRSN; IANA registrar ID 292 (MarkMonitor).
Registrar RDAP publishes an organisational registrant Proxima Beta Europe B.V. with Netherlands country metadata and privacy redactions on natural-person fields. Apex DNS delegates to Tencent’s Dnspod “Pro” authoritative pair, while www publishes through a Tencent EdgeOne-compatible cdn.dnsv1.com canonical name chain terminating on multi-IP Akamai/CDN-looking nodes in sampled Cloudflare resolver output. Passive urlscan corpus entries show OV-class DigiCert issuance, repetitive page title aligning with storefront copy, and HTTP Server: tencent-cos fingerprints.
26 / 100 — aligns with methodology band 21–40 · Moderate risk because geopolitical/export-control overlays for multinational game publishing stacks outweigh pure technical spoofing suspicion (which presently reads low).
confirmed fact No spoof-only infrastructure anomalies (unsigned HTTP downgrade loops, blatant registrar mismatch, hostile parking) surfaced in sampled resolver + passive scan channels.
requires manual check Sanctions/export-control suitability must be rerun against the actual invoicing/signing entity in your onboarding stack — this domain review does not replace OFAC/EU/Ukraine list workflows.
confirmed fact Verisign COM RDAP creation 2023-08-13T03:03:30Z, expiration 2031-08-13T03:03:30Z, standard MarkMonitor theft locks, authoritative NS pair pro01/pro02.dnspod.com.
confirmed fact Registrar RDAP discloses organisational registrant field Proxima Beta Europe B.V. with GDPR-style remarks Redacted registrant contact data via MarkMonitor tooling.
confirmed fact Email stack advertises Exchange Online ingress (arenabreakoutinfinite-com.mail.protection.outlook.com) with hardened SPF (spf.protection.outlook.com -all).
confirmed fact Sole concrete ownership signal in RDAP registrant objects is organisational name Proxima Beta Europe B.V.; natural-person beneficiaries are redacted.
probable link Industry-neutral open sources recurrently bracket Proxima Beta publishing labels under Tencent international operations — treat as reputational/policy context, not a substitute for filings.
probable link Passive scan metadata cites Tencent COS / Edge CDN naming; aligns with Apex TXT tokens referencing Google webmaster tooling and Microsoft 365 onboarding — plausible multi-vendor SaaS perimeter for marketers.
hypothesis Additional related domains (localized stores, influencer landing pages, anti-cheat update endpoints) likely exist beyond this single host — map via certificate transparency once APIs respond.
requires manual check No authoritative OFAC/EU Consolidated/Ukraine NSDC positive match was enumerated during this perimeter job; escalate with sanctioned-party screening keyed to invoicing LEI/name.
confirmed fact Technical registration stack (MarkMonitor, extended horizon, OV TLS) lowers likelihood of improvised criminal clone sites but cannot negate policy prohibitions imposed by purchasers.
requires manual check Videogame IP / anti-cheat / consumer-protection disputes routinely hit major publishers — no docket search here; consult counsel/PACER equivalents if precedent matters materially.
n/a · not found in available sources — no tax-debt registers, bankruptcy notices, or civil enforcement breadcrumbs surfaced through passive DNS/WHOIS alone.
probable link Genre-level discourse (loot economies, cheating, geopolitical sensitivities involving Chinese publishers in Western markets) is ambient for the category.
confirmed fact Public landing copy stresses anti-cheat telemetry and fairness messaging (marketing claim only — independently verify against product disclosures).
confirmed fact Not materially applicable for a videogame marketing host; Ukrainian Prozorro or EU TED searches keyed to UA-EDR identifiers would require a contracting corporate Ukrainian entity unrelated to WHOIS-derived strings.
⚠️ Proceed with restrictions — treat as credible commercial infrastructure lacking signs of improvised impersonation while still aligning with geopolitical/export-control vendor policies before funds, data integrations, or brand co-marketing. Refresh screenings when Proxima Beta or upstream parents change invoicing footprints.
confirmed fact Resolver samples return IP sets announced under CDN-style AS identifiers (multiple 43.x endpoints linked to OVSC CDN scheduling), while passive urlscan results often geolocate egress to Singapore-labelled AS139341.
confirmed fact Verisign RDAP publishes secureDNS.delegationSigned = false — common among consumer brands yet weakens spoofing defenses versus DNSSEC-complete zones.
requires manual check crt.sh automated JSON retrieval failed.
Medium Internet Archive CDX returned an empty dataset for sampled domain-scope query — rerun or broaden parameters outside this window.
| Criterion | Triggered | Factual basis (snapshot) |
|---|---|---|
| Sanctions (official lists) | not enumerated here | requires manual check — rerun in your AML stack against precise legal name/LEI. |
| Connection to RF / RB / occupied territories | n/a | requires manual check if policy mandates geopolitical mapping beyond infra fingerprinting. |
| Bankruptcy / insolvency | no | No insolvency hints pulled from Registrar/Registry objects. |
| Tax debt | n/a | WHOIS-centric pass lacks tax authority confirmations. |
| Enforcement proceedings | not found | Passive OSINT lacks national enforcement DB hits. |
| High litigation activity | contextual only | probable link for marquee publishers — qualitative only. |
| Frequent director changes | n/a | Corporate tree not scraped here. |
| Recent UBO change | n/a | WHOIS organisational field stable snapshot on 2026-05-21 without historical deltas. |
| Related companies with issues | unknown | requires manual check upstream parent mapping. |
| Negative media coverage | not scored | Ambient category noise not numerically adjudicated herein. |
| Tender violations / competition authority | n/a | Marketing domain unrelated to procurements datasets. |
| Final risk score · Range | 26 / 100 — 21–40 · Moderate risk | |
| Registry | Result |
|---|---|
| OFAC Sanctions Search (automated perimeter) | Not enumerated |
| EU Consolidated Financial Sanctions (automated perimeter) | Not enumerated |
| Ukraine · State Register of Sanctions | Not enumerated — use primary drs.nsdc.gov.ua workflow if mandated |
| ICANN-accredited Registrar reference | MarkMonitor Inc. (IANA 292) visible via RDAP |
| Brand / infra alignment cues | DigiCert OV + Tencent COS fingerprints + storefront copy cohesion |
| Prozorro / UA public procurement linkage | n/a for host-only screen |
| ЄДР / ЄДРПОУ corporate registry | n/a — Ukrainian legal entity identifiers not surfaced by subject |